youregonnalovetomorrow:

Barbra Streisand arriving at the premiere of Funny Girl at the Criterion Theater, New York, September 18, 1969.

(via poppinpussiesintopies)

@2 days ago with 194 notes

"

Here is the thing, okay? Coming into a feminist conversation with, “Have you considered that sometimes women acquire free drinks at bars?” is like walking into graduate school during Philosophy finals and saying, “Have you considered that the color blue that I see may not be the color blue that you see?”

Imagine you are the guy who just walked into that Philosophy class and laid that shit down. Imagine the class full of students who have worked very hard and committed themselves and sacrificed to be here, students who have spent several years of their lives learning about this subject. Imagine now their feelings when you go to the head of the classroom with a smirk on your face and demand the professor give you an A for effort. Imagine now that they think you are a douchebag asshole, because they do, and because you are. You are a douchebag asshole because you are obviously so self-centered, arrogant, and completely ignorant of the world around you, that you thought you could walk into a high-level course with no background and no work and say something profoundly simplistic and totally unrelated and also everybody should congratulate you for having done this thing, so brave, so provocative.
[….]
You are not asking us a real question. You are simply illustrating, for all to see, your own ignorance. You are saying, “I have not considered the implications of the question I have just asked. I have not taken the time nor effort nor commitment to sit down and ask myself this question. Instead, I have come into your philosophy classroom/office/feminist blog and shat out my question with a smirk, because I believe that my two seconds of thought are worth more than your long-term analysis, because I believe I am worth more.”

"

Fugivitus: A few things to consider when you find a feminist blog (via absolutely-spiffing)

this is what I’m always trying to explain to these asshats

(via iphisquandary)

(Source: raxn, via dotseurat)

@4 days ago with 8771 notes

STFU, Conservatives: Gender-Neutral Restrooms Become the Law 

transqueery:

When Mayor Michael Nutter signed legislation Thursday to afford equal rights to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, he said he hoped Philadelphia would become “the most LGBT-friendly” city in the world.

One piece of that comprehnsive legislation will forever…

@1 week ago with 910 notes

ppgfreak85:

One of the BEST ad campaigns about representation I have seen.

Everyone has a backbone. Use yours.

(via feministbecky)

@3 weeks ago with 99010 notes

fuckyeahsmashtv:

Hit List’s “The Goodbye Song”
From 2x13 | Purchase Here

@3 weeks ago with 212 note and 1330 play

(Source: jimmyg-rated, via gay-boys-mind)

@3 days ago with 153 notes

stupidbuscrash:

and we go bum bum bum ba ba bum bum bum

(via newyorkshows)

@1 week ago with 48 notes
h0tdude: +++++

h0tdude:

+++++

(via hotguysandabs)

@1 week ago with 1346 notes

fuckyeahsmashtv:

Hit List’s “Don’t Let Me Know”
From 2x13 | Purchase Here

@3 weeks ago with 210 note and 1295 play
merciray: heckyeahbatfam: thesonicscrew: torigates: Can anyone tell me if this is an actual promo shot or a manip? Because if it is a promo shot I WANT TO WEEP WITH ITS RIGHTNESS, HOLY GOD. Lois in STANDING IN FRONT OF CLARK. She’s in the foreground! SHE IS STANDING IN A PHYSICALLY STRONG POSE. She is staring STRAIGHT AHEAD (i.e. she is NOT averting her gaze). Her shoulders are back, her legs are planted firmly on the ground, shoulder width apart, STEADY. SHE IS TAKING UP SPACE, AND NOT OVERTLY SEXUALIZED. CLARK IS STANDING BEHIND HER MIRRORING HER POSE. This is the most beautiful photo I have ever seen, holy fucking god. GETTING IT RIGHT. (to answer the question, yes it’s official, it’s from Empire magazine) Too often, female characters are posed for these promotional shots in distinctly sexual (and just plain uncomfortable) positions and told that it is somehow supposed to empower them; here, Lois Lane demonstrates both the strength and the femininity of her character through a confident, assertive stance. Because the two go hand-in-hand. (Not to mention that, as previously stated, Clark is not only behind her, but also mirroring her pose.) Love it. Advertising. You’re doin’ it right.

merciray:

heckyeahbatfam:

thesonicscrew:

torigates:

Can anyone tell me if this is an actual promo shot or a manip? Because if it is a promo shot I WANT TO WEEP WITH ITS RIGHTNESS, HOLY GOD. Lois in STANDING IN FRONT OF CLARK. She’s in the foreground! SHE IS STANDING IN A PHYSICALLY STRONG POSE. She is staring STRAIGHT AHEAD (i.e. she is NOT averting her gaze). Her shoulders are back, her legs are planted firmly on the ground, shoulder width apart, STEADY. SHE IS TAKING UP SPACE, AND NOT OVERTLY SEXUALIZED. CLARK IS STANDING BEHIND HER MIRRORING HER POSE. This is the most beautiful photo I have ever seen, holy fucking god. GETTING IT RIGHT.

(to answer the question, yes it’s official, it’s from Empire magazine)

Too often, female characters are posed for these promotional shots in distinctly sexual (and just plain uncomfortable) positions and told that it is somehow supposed to empower them; here, Lois Lane demonstrates both the strength and the femininity of her character through a confident, assertive stance. Because the two go hand-in-hand.

(Not to mention that, as previously stated, Clark is not only behind her, but also mirroring her pose.)

Love it.

Advertising. You’re doin’ it right.

(Source: ruthgilmartin, via feministpixie)

@3 weeks ago with 22867 notes